Weekend - Sun Herald
|
DR CHRIS Moss has a cupboard full of pert, perfect breasts: silicone and saline, round and teardrop-shaped, light and heavy. The plastic surgeon glides across his consulting room floor, takes a silicone implant in his palm and jogs it up and down as if weighing its merits. ‘‘These are the gold standard,’’ he declares. They’re squishy ‘‘like turkish delight’’. Leakage is rare and then only limited. If properly installed, they look and feel natural. And, best of all, he says, they change women’s lives. He’s dealing with the very core of feminine aesthetics in the one hand and with a scalpel and the carpentry of surgery in the other. Melbourne is in peak boob-job season. The taboo about unnecessary surgery is well and truly off as more women have the operation. And the size of the implants women are choosing is gradually increasing. Moss’s cosmetic-surgery business is prospering. They come for facelifts and rhinoplasty. But breast augmentation is the most common surgical cosmetic procedure wanted by women. He’s booked up ’til March. ‘‘Mostly, people just want to look and feel normal,’’ he says simply, in strong defence of women who have adequate breasts (by all accounts except their own) but want them to be bigger, or smaller, or higher, or fuller. Apparently they just want to wear ‘‘normal’’ clothes, to not feel the need to look uncomfortably at themselves each time they pass a mirror. Moss flicks through the plastic sheets in his albums of before-and-after photos. A look of pride flits across his face. His own brag book, evidence of his successes, a compelling sales tool. At 45, Moss looks 10 years younger. He readily admits he’s had Botox treatment, which helped plump out a few age wrinkles. He’s the father of three small children with a warm and friendly wife, Andrea — beautiful by necessity, surely, with a husband in Moss’s line of work. |
|
Until this point, the surgery seems almost dainty — more electronics than truck mechanics. You wonder how the 315ml silicone, teardrop-shaped implants are going to fit into place through such a small cut. Moss braces, his feet spread to keep traction. An instrument that looks a bit like a shoe horn pulls open the hole to give him access and he pushes in the top part of the implant. It squishes gradually into the red split. He needs the force of both his thumbs to work them into place. You would do well to imagine the effort required to stuff a puffy sleeping bag into an impossibly small carry bag. The fit is appropriately snug. Emma’s incisions are deftly stitched in layers by a surgeon who’s done it 940 times. Bigger breasts in one hour. Even before she wakes and stands, before the healing starts, Emma’s breasts look as if they’ve always been this size. For the first time you might — might — understand why women do it. And though Moss is proud of his record of minimal complications, he cautions there is potential for things to go wrong. This process should not be undertaken lightly, and not by a medic full of unrealistic promises and seeking a quick buck. There are enough of them — undertrained and over-sold — to bother Moss and other plastic surgeons performing cosmetic procedures. A third of his cases are repairs of surgery gone wrong, done by other practitioners. Not all surgeons like to talk about this augmentation procedure. Breast implants have received more put-downs than praise since the 1980s. A scourge of leaking implants, cancer scares, scar tissue, alien-like lumps and collapses and the 14-year query over silicone implants’ safety were, if not commonplace, highly publicised. |
||||
|
MOSS, with 16 years of medical and surgical training, is a willing interview subject, to extricate himself from the ivory tower in which plastic cosmetic surgeons seem to have sat. ‘‘We haven’t engaged with the public. We’ve allowed other unqualified people to get in there and engage, advertise and form networks,’’ he says. He also partly attributes the rise in breast enlargement by underqualified surgeons to the stigma associated with having it done. Glib statements trivialise women’s concerns. ‘‘That’s been damaging and led to practitioners coming along who weren’t necessarily good. It created, if you like, backyard operations.’’ Moss is responsible for a good many of the bigger ‘‘society’’ busts — actors, dancers, the rich and famous. He’s moved his practice to bigger Toorak premises — a building with 30 rooms and parking at the back so his highprofile clients need not be seen. But the real growth area in breast enhancement is mothers who want their old breasts back. Sara was one of those. When Moss talks about women who have bodyimage issues that seriously and negatively affect them, he’s referring to women like her. Sara breastfed two babies for two years each and went from a C-cup prepregnancy to ‘‘flat as a tack’’. ‘‘I couldn’t stand the sight of myself. I didn’t want my husband to see me or touch me. I was upset all the time. I was fine as a mum and a friend, but didn’t have it in me to be intimate and feminine and sexy,’’ she recalls. She spent hundreds of dollars on potions that were supposed to enhance her breasts naturally. They didn’t work. Sara’s husband, concerned for her mental state, encouraged her to take whatever steps she felt were necessary to return to her old self. She filled up stocking toes with rice and packed them into D-cup bras to check the possibilities. Then she maxed out two credit cards, paid Moss about $11,000, and went up to a DD cup. That was two years ago. Life has taken a U-turn. She’s happy. She’s had another baby and is still breastfeeding, without impediment. Her implant was placed under the muscle, so didn’t affect milk production. Stories such as Sara’s give Chris Moss great satisfaction. He has no sense that his surgical skills are being wasted on vanity. He regards his work as life-changing. |
|
||||||
Pump-ups through time for more than 100 years, women have scaled serious medical heights to go up a cup size
1890s Women are injected with paraffin, but success is limited because of infection and lump formation. Experiments also with glass and ivory.
1895 Fat transplant surgery is performed in Germany, but the fat is reabsorbed.
1940s Japanese prostitutes, to create curves attractive to US servicemen, are injected with liquid silicone.
1950s Experiments with synthetic sponge implants fail because scientists cannot find a man-made substance that has no side-effects.
1962 Frank Gerow experiments with injectable silicone and colleague Thomas Cronin develops the liquid silicone breast implant.
1963 Cronin makes the implants commercially with Dow Corning, producing a thin-walled silastic capsule filled with a runny silicone gel.
1965 Introduction of the saline implant, a silicone capsule containing saline solution.
Mid-1970s Second-generation implants are developed. With a thinner shell wall and slightly thicker gel, they feel softer but the thinner shell causes problems.
Early 1980s Implants have a stronger silicone shell and thicker gel.
1988-1991 US medical regulator (FDA) is notified of problems with early-generation implants.
Early 1990s Fourth-generation implants introduced. They are rounded and contain a more cohesive silicone gel.
1992 FDA imposes moratorium on silicone-gel breast implants.
1993 Fifth-generation implants developed, tear-drop shaped and in high cohesive form.
1994 Plaintiffs win global settlement of $3.5 billion from implant makers. Dow Corning goes into chapter 11 bankruptcy.
2006 FDA lifts its restrictions after studies show no link between silicone breast implants and adverse health affects.
![]() |
Click here to view PDF version |





